Good point! thanks!btw, what I posted yesterday was the 2nd paragraph from her homework...there were a lot more.....i was not surprised by her writing..all pre-teens write things like that....I was nicely surprised by her left-wing thinking..but guess that was natural for a girl at her age....
-mikesmith(老猫);
2012-12-13{275}(#7951863@0)
Good question. The "animal" in the 2nd statement is a general reference and is in a plural form, thus I did not use an article beofre it. The following "animals" specifically refer to the "cats and dogs" that are abused, as afore-mentioned.Yes, a fur coat costs, not a fur coats cost. It is my typo. Could not revise once I had a reply. Tks for pointing it out.
-goingconern(GoingConcern);
2012-12-13{121}(#7952148@0)
Thanks for correcting:-). All makes sense except that "the" is not necessary before "reasons".
-goingconern(GoingConcern);
2012-12-14(#7953586@0)
I normally don't critique people's critiques, butA fur coats cost many lives of animals -> probably means "a fur coat", not "coats", "many animal lives" sounds more natural
Animal abuse is a big problem; there are reasons why human beings abuse the animals. -> "the animals", "the" sounds very strange
-wincity(红卫兵);
2012-12-14{265}(#7953595@0)
I agree with you that grammatical correctness is fundamental. However, I feel understanding a different perspective is also more important than jumping to your own interpretation. The bigger picture here is logical thinking in writing andI do think there is an element of truth in this perspective, should we all be open-minded enough.
-goingconern(GoingConcern);
2012-12-17{97}(#7958133@0)