×

Loading...
Ad by
  • 推荐 OXIO 加拿大高速网络,最低月费仅$40. 使用推荐码 RCR37MB 可获得一个月的免费服务
Ad by
  • 推荐 OXIO 加拿大高速网络,最低月费仅$40. 使用推荐码 RCR37MB 可获得一个月的免费服务

Trump criminal cases brought by Jack Smith set to be closed before he enters White House。花了纳税人35million

Sign in and Reply Report

Replies, comments and Discussions:

  • 枫下茶话 / 社会政治 / Bill Barr 认为现在司法部和几个州对川普的诉讼应该撤诉,因为这些起诉都不够有力,所以撤诉对国家是最好的。 +1
    • 不会撤诉的,民主党会继续法律纠缠。民主党不会善罢甘休,会继续对抗川普总统的每一个总统令。 +2
      • 民主党如果在川普的这届任期内仍然拿恶诉讼来扯皮,真就是破罐破摔。人民已经烦透了这种伎俩 +4
    • Trump criminal cases brought by Jack Smith set to be closed before he enters White House。花了纳税人35million +3
      • 川普作为总统真是真金不怕火炼。你把他视为狗屎,可他偏偏就是没有臭味儿 +3
        • I beg to differ. +1
          The cases are going to close not because there is no case against him. On the contrary, at least in the case of DC court, all evidences are now submitted to the judge and can be viewed by the public. The cases are closed because department of justice follows its internal rule that it cannot prosecute a sitting president.
          • Bill Barr今天在访谈中呼吁close cases 的理由是这些 cases 都非常weak。 +2
            • That’s Bill Barr’s opinion. Weak or not, the case should be litigated to determine its merits under normal circumstances. Unfortunately now we have a king, who is untouchable.
              We have created a king, who controls both senate and house, has no guard rail any more, and enjoys infinite immunity. Keep that in mind for the next four years
              • 如果是这样说法的话,还应该把通俄门再掀出来做文章,至少可以阻碍他的停战企图 +2
                • You know what.
                  In the next four years, God forbid, should Trump choose to collude with Russia or China, which I don’t have reasons to believe he will because I believe trump’s patriotism, there will be no one around him to say no. Jusitice department cannot investigate nor can it prosecute him. And congress won’t impeach him or invoke 25A because he controls both senate and house.
                  • 从1993 到1995 克林顿任期的头两年,两院都是民主党的。从2003 到 2007 小布什的任期内,两院都是共和党的。从2009到2011 Obama任期的头两年,两院都是民主党的。从2021到2023 拜登任期的头两年,两院都是民主党的。那时候天没有塌下来,为什么轮到川普就会塌? +3
                    • They didn’t enjoy infinite immunity backed by the Supreme Court.

                      Clinton was investigated by special counsel Ken Starr. Not anymore now. Trump is the king.
                      • 这个说法也许比较牵强。印象里川普任期好象只是提名了三位大法官,除了卡瓦纳之外,其他两位都是两党共同拥戴的。
                        • I was talking about the recent Supreme Court rulings that literally granted him infinite immunity.
                          He has the law with him.the law is now written on the wall. He s simply not prosecutable during the time in office. He literally can ask seal team 6 to kill a US citizen without account ability. Cannot investigate. Cannot prosecute. Cannot impeach. He is the king.
                          • 不太懂你的逻辑。Supreme Court 的rulings 发生在川普赢得选举之前,和他没有关系,并不是为他量身定制。如果他败选,哈里斯入主白宫,rulings 同样有效。
                            • 别听他胡说八道,在任总统从来就是不能起诉的,只能弹劾。这次大法官只是再明确一下而已,以前也是一样的规矩。
                              • With this new ruling, he cannot be prosecuted even after he leaves the office , as long as he committed the crimes that’s within his official duty while in office.
                            • For almost two hundred years,
                              there had been no need for the SCOTUS to rule on presidential immunity, simply because all presidents before Trump respects the constitution and democratic institutions. Most importantly, they all have decencies. The reason SCOTUS made such ruling this time around is the investigation of Trumps role in J6. And the SCOTUS wants to shield him from prosecution. So now he has the immunity. He can do whatever now.